AI design review for electrical power systems
Catch the error before
it gets energized.
Upload a drawing set — single-line, cable schedule, panel schedules — and get a located redline report of every conflict, undersized conductor, and code gap. The review a second engineer should do, done in minutes instead of days.
For design firms, EPCs, and solo power engineers who stamp their own work.
- FDR-01 Transformer impedance missing — short-circuit study can't close.
- FDR-02 Feeder conductor undersized for 250 HP motor FLA + 125%.
- FDR-03 Panel tag on one-line doesn't match the panel schedule.
The second set of eyes never has enough time.
On a power project the drawings, the load schedule, the cable list, and the protection settings all have to agree. They rarely do on the first pass — and the person checking is the same person on a deadline, cross-referencing PDFs by hand.
Errors hide between documents
A feeder is 400A on the one-line and 350A on the schedule. Each sheet looks fine alone. The conflict only shows up when someone reads both at once.
Review doesn't scale
A thorough check of a full drawing set is days of tedious cross-referencing. So it gets sampled, or skipped, and the gap ships to the field.
The cost lands downstream
A missed undersize or a stale tag becomes a change order, a re-stamp, or a tripped breaker at commissioning — long after the drawing left the office.
Upload the set. Get it back redlined.
A review pipeline, not a chatbot. Deterministic engineering math does what math can; Claude does the reading and the judgment.
-
01
Read the set
Drawings, single-lines, cable and panel schedules — PDF, DXF, or a native EasyPower / PowerPro model. Every sheet and table becomes structured data.
-
02
Cross-check
Ratings, tags, and connectivity are reconciled across documents. Conductor sizing, voltage drop, and load totals are recomputed and compared against what's drawn.
-
03
Redline, located
Each finding points to the exact sheet, element, and value — with the rule or calculation behind it. You review a marked-up set, not a wall of text.
-
04
Push the fix
Accept a finding and the correction can be applied straight to the one-line model and re-checked — the drawing and the data stay in agreement.
Built on Claude
Claude is the engineer in the loop — not a feature bolted on.
Reviewing a drawing set is a reasoning problem over messy, visual, interlinked documents. That is the work Claude is uniquely suited to, and it's the core of the product.
- Reads the drawings. Claude's vision parses scanned and vector sheets — symbols, callouts, and schedule tables — into the structured model the checks run on.
- Holds the judgment. Where a rule needs interpretation — an ambiguous tag, an exception, intent across sheets — Claude reasons about it and shows its reasoning.
- Writes back safely. Through a tool interface over the one-line model, Claude proposes edits that are applied as reviewable, versioned changes — never a silent overwrite.
Founder
Engineering the Engineering is built by Mahsum Özer, a solo founder who ships software for a living and works in power systems. He builds and sells Mac applications directly to users, and has spent the last stretch building the pieces this product is made of: a studio that reads and edits EasyPower / PowerPro single-line diagrams through a Claude tool interface, and a pipeline that pulls cable and panel data out of real construction drawings and validates it against NEC math.
Those tools already do the hard half — turning drawings into structured, checkable data and letting Claude operate on it. Engineering the Engineering turns that into the product every power engineer actually wants: a reviewer that reads the whole set and tells you what's wrong.
Request early access
Early access is opening to a small group of power design firms and independent engineers. If you review drawing sets — or wish someone did — get in touch with the kind of work you do.
hello@engineeringtheengineering.com